A simple data set for in-class illustration about how to estimate and interpret interactive relationships. The data here are deliberately minimal for that end.
Format
A data frame with 5914 observations on the following 14 variables.
version
version identifier from ANES
caseid
time-series case identifier from ANES
health
oppose/"NFNO"/favor abortion if pregnancy would hurt woman
fatal
oppose/"NFNO"/favor abortion if pregnancy would cause woman to die
incest
oppose/"NFNO"/favor abortion if pregnancy was caused by incest
rape
oppose/"NFNO"/favor abortion if pregnancy was caused by rape
bd
oppose/"NFNO"/favor abortion if fetus would be born with serious birth defect
fin
oppose/"NFNO"/favor abortion if having child would impose financial hardship
sex
oppose/"NFNO"/favor abortion if the child will not be the sex the woman wants
choice
oppose/"NFNO"/favor abortion if woman chooses to have one
pid
respondent's partisanship (Democrat, Independent, Republican)
knowspeaker
was the respondent able to correctly identify the Speaker of the House (John Boehner)
addchoice
an additive scale of the abortion scores
lchoice
a continuous latent scale of pro-choice scores (from a simple graded response model)
Details
"NFNO" = "Neither Favor Nor Oppose". All abortion prompts are on a 0-2 scale where 0 is oppose, 1 is "NFNO", and 2 is favor. The respondent's party identification is on a similar scale where 0 = "Democrat", 1 = "Independent", and 2 = "Republican". The additive scale of abortion scores has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 16.